Up hill Running Knee Pain
Up hill Running Knee Pain
I am providing this article which is a compilation of various sources to educate coaches on the protocol and safety measures of Up hill Running Knee Pain.
I am seeing a lot of unstructured hill type sessions being done too close to competitions especially in the Philippines. In Australia, coaches do up hill running but with a lot of protocols in place. I have included a peer review article regarding the dangers of up hill running on knees if not done correctly.
Optimal inclines and distances
Use of softer surfaces such as Grass Hills instead of Hard road surfaces.
And as a result, athletes are getting knee injuries. As opposed to downhill running.
- Pain tends to be worse when ascending stairs or hills, but maybe painful both ascending and descending.
- Pain first started while going up hill.
- Knee problems really blow out a lot
Many runners with knee pain don’t prepare for the worst. They get help slowly — if at all — and then weeks later realize they aren’t getting good help. By that time, their training schedule is blown to hell.
Running hills is a very common prescription by coaches for all variety of sports, including running sports
Running is a great enough exercise on its own, being one of the best cardiovascular and respiratory improvers around, so running up hill must be even better. Or at least that’s the thought behind it.
Since endurance is a derivative of strength, it makes sense that people would believe this
Hill running, like resistance training, plyometrics, or jump training increases your strength and power, so it makes sense to think it would improve your running too.
While this is certainly true to a point, a recent study in the Journal of Strength and Conditioning casts some doubt on the common wisdom.
In the study, researchers reviewed the prevailing literature on this topic and realized that there isn’t much out there
Specifically, they found only one study, which didn’t examine whether up hill running was better than flat terrain running. So they decided to make a study of their own.
The researchers wanted to know if running to exhaustion at an athlete’s VO2max would
be improved more from running intervals on hilly terrain (in this case 10% grade) versus
intervals on flat terrain
They chose experienced athletes, and for good reason. Novice athletes improve across the board pretty much no matter what they do, so the difference between strength and cardio programs would be less significant for novices than it would be for advanced athletes.
It’s important to know if the benefit from training holds as acclimation’s to training become more specific as an athlete improves.
There was only one significant difference between the two groups, and it was a big one. The group running flat could run for longer at the end – a lot longer.
The hill group made a 30% improvement in the time they could maintain their VO2max pace at after six weeks, which is nothing to scoff at, but the flat running group made a 60% improvement in the same amount of time.
The reason for this is likely that running flat is less intense.
The reduced intensity allows for more training, and more training is a bigger stimulus for improvement to running performance at a VO2max pace than the relatively small difference in intensity, plain and simple. In my experience as a coach, more training is better for pretty much any athletic goal you have, as long as you can rest adequately.
One thing that can be said about uphill running is that it doesn’t have quite the impact of flat running.
Because it yields good gains to running on flat terrain it may still be a good supplement to normal running. And, of course, if you plan on competing in any event involving running on hills, the practice is essential, make no mistake.
As it turns out, the common suggestion to run hills even for flat running conditions doesn’t deserve quite the attention it gets from coaches. If you’re training to compete, running on flat terrain is better than running uphill.
Hill training generally, including the Lydiard hill circuit, helps the athlete transition from the aerobic phase into the anaerobic phase of training (or General Practice to Specific Practice in our system).
The standard programs only feature this workout during the dedicated phase for this work (dynamic strength) but some runners have employed it successfully much later in training to keep maintaining strength and speed.
Abstract: Ferley, DD, Osborn, RW, and Vukovich, MD. The effects of uphill vs. level-grade high-intensity interval training on V[Combining Dot Above]O2max, Vmax, VLT, and Tmax in well-trained distance runners. J Strength Cond Res 27(6): 1549–1559, 2013—Uphill running represents a frequently used and often prescribed training tactic in the development of competitive distance runners but remains largely uninvestigated and unsubstantiated as a training modality.
The purpose of this investigation
The purpose of this investigation included documenting the effects of uphill interval training compared with level-grade interval training on maximal oxygen consumption (V[Combining Dot Above]O2max), the running speed associated with V[Combining Dot Above]O2max (Vmax), the running speed associated with lactate threshold (VLT), and the duration for which Vmax can be sustained (Tmax) in well-trained distance runners.
Thirty-two well-trained distance runners (age, 27.4 ± 3.8 years; body mass, 64.8 ± 8.9 kg; height, 173.6 ± 6.4 cm; and V[Combining Dot Above]O2max, 60.9 ± 8.5 ml·min−1·kg−1) received an assignment to an uphill interval training group (GHill = 12), level-grade interval training group (GFlat = 12), or control group (GCon = 8). GHill and GFlat completed 12 intervals and 12 continuous running sessions over 6 weeks, whereas GCon maintained their normal training routine.
Pre- and posttest measures of V[Combining Dot Above]O2max, Vmax, VLT, and Tmax were used to assess performance. A 3 × 2 repeated measures analysis of variance was performed for each dependent variable and revealed a significant difference in Tmax in both GHill and GFlat (p < 0.05).
With regard to running performance, the results indicate that both uphill and level-grade interval training can induce significant improvements in a run-to-exhaustion test in well-trained runners at the speed associated with V[Combining Dot Above]O2max but that traditional level-grade training produces greater gains.
How to run uphill
When running up a hill, you’ve got to do extra work to overcome gravity. This requires your body to recruit more muscles in your legs to overcome the force of gravity and carry you up the slope.
Speaking of the incline, the fact that the ground is slanted also alters your footstrike. Forcing you to transition to more of a mid/forefoot-striking style. And increasing the forces going through your calves and ankles.
This is ultimately a good thing when it comes to performance, as it allows you to get more “rebound” from the ground. Some energy from the impact is stored in your calf muscles. And is then released again when you straighten your leg and drive off the ground.
Don’t lean forward at the waist
Most runners’ natural reaction when they start running up a hill is to lean into it, usually by bending forward at the waist.
While it is true that some degree of forwarding lean is necessary when running up a hill, a lot of people lean much too far forward. This negatively impacts your uphill running ability in several ways.
- First, leaning forward inhibits your ability to flex your hips. And drive your knee up during the “swing” phase of your gait. You can prove this to yourself right now by standing up straight. And lifting your knee towards your chest using your hip flexors.
- Then attempting to do the same thing if you bend forward at the waist. Note the small but perceptible increase in difficulty. An excessive forward lean shortens your hip flexor’s range of motion, hurting your efficiency.
- Additionally, leaning too far forward inhibits your ability to produce a powerful “toe-off” during the “drive” phase of your gait. To push off the ground and take advantage of the additional energy stored in your calf muscles. You need to fully extend your leg straight behind you. Which is achieved most effectively when your upper body is not slanted forward. When you “stand tall” when running up a hill. It makes it easier for your glutes to extend your leg behind you.
- Finally, a forward lean also throws your body off-balance by moving your center of gravity too far forward. Without getting too into the nitty-gritty. This also makes it harder for your glutes to drive your leg backward. By increasing the leverage they have to overcome. The positioning of your center of gravity will also come into play. When it comes to running downhill, so don’t forget about it.
Helpful mental cues to maintain proper form
Although you will have a noticeable forward lean when running uphill, it’s helpful to think about “standing tall” when you run up a hill, since you’re unlikely to be leaning too far back. This is one of those mental cues that, while technically inaccurate, is still very helpful.
Other helpful cues include “drive your hips” which reminds you to focus on using your hip muscles to power your way up the hill and extend your leg fully behind you. Once you’ve crested a hill, take care not to slouch over, since that will wreak havoc on your efficiency on the flats, too.